[uf-discuss] [citation] Call for scope check (was Re:
Citation: next steps?)
Tantek Ç elik
tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Fri Sep 22 17:07:44 PDT 2006
On 9/22/06 4:48 PM, "Ryan Cannon" <ryan at ryancannon.com> wrote:
> Why aren't we looking for an established format to fulfill our 80/20
> requirement and become a
> good 1:1 scope?
We are. There is much debate about which format to re-use existing property
names etc. from.
> Perhaps instead of wheel reinvention, we should look to one of these
> well-used citation formats.
> Is there any reason why neither BibTex nor EndNote fields are listed
> in the citation-examples
> page of the wiki?
That's what the citation-formats page is for. Pre-existing formats such as
BibTex and EndNote.
More information about the microformats-discuss