[uf-discuss] Geo -proposed move from draft to full spec (was: Geo - why still draft)

[Andy Mabbett]

In message
<cdc278e10704090426o1149bdedif552a21dccec98cf at mail.gmail.com>, Ciaran
McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> writes

>On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>> Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published
>> hCard spec?
>
>It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on
>its own that is a draft specification, I believe.
>
>GEO and ADR as stand-alone microformats outside of hCard came later,
>which is why they're at a less advanced stage than hCard.

In that case, I think it satisfies the requirements, such as they are,
at:

   <http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Specifications>

and should be made a full specification. Any objections?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
            *  Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
            *  Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
            *  Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?