[uf-discuss] Geo -proposed move from draft to full spec (was: Geo -
why still draft)
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Mon Apr 9 05:01:15 PDT 2007
<cdc278e10704090426o1149bdedif552a21dccec98cf at mail.gmail.com>, Ciaran
McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> writes
>On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>> Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published
>> hCard spec?
>It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on
>its own that is a draft specification, I believe.
>GEO and ADR as stand-alone microformats outside of hCard came later,
>which is why they're at a less advanced stage than hCard.
In that case, I think it satisfies the requirements, such as they are,
and should be made a full specification. Any objections?
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
More information about the microformats-discuss