[uf-discuss] Poll: Proposed change to adr/ hCard for 'adr with no
brian.suda at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 14:00:51 PDT 2007
On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> Further to discussion at:
> it is proposed to amend the adr spec, and the corresponding part of the
> hCard spec, thus:
--- i disagree. Any ADR that has no structured data is just a LABEL.
ADR has a structure, and therefore an ADR with no children has NO
structure and parsers do NOT have to anything more! The spec and RFC
is pretty clear on this.
> Where the adr has content, but no valid sub-properties, parsers
> [MAY | SHOULD | MUST] output the content of that adr as a single
> vCard [output-field] field.
> Please express you opinions at:
> where I have set up a straw-poll page for your convenience.
> (should this also be mentioned on the -dev list?)
> Andy Mabbett
> * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss