[uf-discuss] Poll: Proposed change to adr/ hCard for 'adr with no children'

[Brian Suda]

On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Further to discussion at:
>
>         <http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-brainstorming#ADR_with_no_children>
>
> it is proposed to amend the adr spec, and the corresponding part of the
> hCard spec, thus:

--- i disagree. Any ADR that has no structured data is just a LABEL.
ADR has a structure, and therefore an ADR with no children has NO
structure and parsers do NOT have to anything more! The spec and RFC
is pretty clear on this.

>         Where the adr has content, but no valid sub-properties, parsers
>         [MAY | SHOULD | MUST] output the content of that adr as a single
>         vCard [output-field] field.
>
> Please express you opinions at:
>
>         <http://microformats.org/wiki/adr-poll>
>
> where I have set up a straw-poll page for your convenience.
>
> (should this also be mentioned on the -dev list?)
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
>             *  Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
>             *  Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
>             *  Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>


-- 
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk