[uf-discuss] [hListing][hReview] 'Description' conflict
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Tue Apr 24 14:02:02 PDT 2007
In message <462E28F2.60109 at ben-ward.co.uk>, Ben Ward
<lists at ben-ward.co.uk> writes
>I was recently trying to implement mark-up with both hListing (draft)
>and hReview combined. For the most part the properties align except in
>the case of 'DESCRIPTION'.
>The conflict here is that review specifies 'full text' whilst hListing
>is permitting it to be used more loosely. But, if a piece of content is
>marked up with both hListing AND hReview, even though the description
>is optional in hReview, an hReview parser will not find 'full text'
>from the description classname.
>Since 'SUMMARY' is already claimed in hListing for the purposes of the
>listing title, I'd like to solicit suggestions on resolving the
I can't help with that, but perhaps a stage of "check for conflicts with
other uFs" should be added top the "process"?
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
More information about the microformats-discuss