[uf-discuss] Best practice for the abbr pattern
Tantek Ç elik
tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Fri Apr 27 10:58:57 PDT 2007
On 4/27/07 10:47 AM, "Dr. Ernie Prabhakar" <ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com>
> Hi Jeremy,
> On Apr 27, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Jeremy Keith wrote:
>> However, the datetime can also be written with dashes and colons
>> like this:
>> Would everyone agree that, for the sake of screen reader users, we
>> should update the wiki to strongly encourage this more verbose
>> version of datetimes and strongly discourage the contracted version?
> Can you confirm that:
> a) This will in fact solve the screen reader problem
That's much too big a request ;)
It's also unnecessary.
As long as there is improvement, it is worth the change.
And the improvement is reading it as "two thousand seven [pause] three
[pause]... " etc. rather than "twenty million ...".
> b) This still conforms with all the relevant W3C recommendations
ISO8601 is an ISO standard, not W3C.
That being said, the W3C *note* (not recommendation) date and time which is
a profile (subset) of ISO8601:
actually recommends using the "-" and ":" separators explicitly.
I will add an informative reference accordingly to hCalendar for better
> If so, then I'd agree with you, as the hyphenated version is also
> more human-readable, and thus seems in keeping with microformat
Yes the "hyphenated date is more human readable than unhyphenated" argument
has been before, and as you say, is preferred per microformat principles.
More information about the microformats-discuss