[uf-discuss] XOXO Special Properties

[Kevin Marks]

there are python and java versions here, with some tests

http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-sample-code

refactoring tests into the HTML + JSON style discussed for hCard et al
would be a fine idea.

On Aug 2, 2007 3:47 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's a good idea. I'll definitely look into existing parsers. I have
> located xoxo.rb (http://tinyurl.com/3ygt7e), which should be helpful.
> Christian's site seems to be down at the moment.
>
> I see that Hixie raised a similar issue a while back:
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-issues
>
> :DG<
>
>
> On 8/2/07, Ernest Prabhakar <ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dmitri,
> >
> > On Aug 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> > > My intent is to use XOXO for configuration (remember plists discussion
> > > from a while back?) and I would like to make sure I don't write code
> > > that does something unacceptable or illogical.
> > >
> > > Since there is not much heard anymore about the glorious XOXO
> > > adventures, I am wondering if the world has moved on to something
> > > bigger and better?
> >
> > I think XOXO is considered a "solved" problem (for some value of
> > "solved") which may be why there isn't much  chatter.  Your solution
> > sounds reasonable to me -- have you compared it to the existing parsers?
> >
> > -enp
> > _______________________________________________
> > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>