[uf-discuss] Re: XOXO Special Properties

[Dimitri Glazkov]

Sorry. The HTML + JSON style tests... in other words, the test to
which to convert. I don't think I am familiar with those.

:DG<

On 8/2/07, Kevin Marks <kevinmarks at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-sample-code#testxoxo.py
>
> and similarly fro other languages (this code predates the repository).
>
> On Aug 2, 2007 5:30 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can you point me to the existing tests?
> >
> >
> > On 8/2/07, Kevin Marks <kevinmarks at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > there are python and java versions here, with some tests
> > >
> > > http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-sample-code
> > >
> > > refactoring tests into the HTML + JSON style discussed for hCard et al
> > > would be a fine idea.
> > >
> > > On Aug 2, 2007 3:47 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > That's a good idea. I'll definitely look into existing parsers. I have
> > > > located xoxo.rb (http://tinyurl.com/3ygt7e), which should be helpful.
> > > > Christian's site seems to be down at the moment.
> > > >
> > > > I see that Hixie raised a similar issue a while back:
> > > >
> > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-issues
> > > >
> > > > :DG<
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/2/07, Ernest Prabhakar <ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Dmitri,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Aug 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> > > > > > My intent is to use XOXO for configuration (remember plists discussion
> > > > > > from a while back?) and I would like to make sure I don't write code
> > > > > > that does something unacceptable or illogical.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since there is not much heard anymore about the glorious XOXO
> > > > > > adventures, I am wondering if the world has moved on to something
> > > > > > bigger and better?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think XOXO is considered a "solved" problem (for some value of
> > > > > "solved") which may be why there isn't much  chatter.  Your solution
> > > > > sounds reasonable to me -- have you compared it to the existing parsers?
> > > > >
> > > > > -enp
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > > > > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > > > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > > > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>