[uf-discuss] inappropriate behaviour

[Griffin Caprio]

Scott,

I think everyone would agree with your statement.  However, Andy's  
concern with regards to the administration still hasn't been  
addressed.  This is the second time since I have subscribed to this  
list that there has been someone temporarily banned and both times  
there was the perception that the administration acted unfairly.

I think the only think Andy is asking is for the administration to  
act with a bit of transparency & consistency.

Ciao,
Griffin

On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:

> On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> My real concern is not with your intemperate response, but with  
>> the hypocrisy of an administration that allows you free reign to  
>> make one, but penalises another editor for disagreeing with a  
>> member of that administration, using far milder terms.
>
> I think everyone here has free reign to make a mistake now and  
> then.  We're only human.  It's only repeated mistakes that threaten  
> to change our community standards.  If the list were full of name- 
> calling, for example, people would start to think name-calling were  
> acceptable in this community.  So in those cases, we have to take  
> some action if we want to maintain our community standards.  In my  
> opinion, those tasked with this job do have an increased  
> responsibility to adhere to those standards (e.g. "be nice").  But  
> we're still only human, so we're still permitted the occasional  
> mistake, just like everyone else.
>
> Peace,
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss