[uf-discuss] uF's on stand-alone phone numbers.

[Martin McEvoy]

On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 12:46 -0700, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
> Hello Andy,
> 
> On 8/23/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> > In message
> > <84ce626f0708230946q3ac984abibad8df4d14f6c485 at mail.gmail.com>, Charles
> > Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> writes
> >
> > >On 8/23/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >[...]
> > >
> > >> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn org tel">+43 780 004711</span></span>
> > >
> > >I don't know if "fn" and "org" really belong in there.
> >
> > Why would they not?
> >
> > The number is the telephone number of the contact or entity named,
> > identified or labelled as "+43 780 004711".
> 
> Just because you can identify someone (or some group) by a phone
> number doesn't make that their "name".
> 
> It's like... you can identify someone by their SIN (... or Social
> Security # in the USA)... but that does NOT make that their name.  And
> thus you would NOT put a "fn" on that.

FN [1] represents the name of the object not a person so to speak

so the use of fn in Andys example is fair use I would say.

Thanks
Martin

[1] 3.1.1 FN Type Definition http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2426.txt 


> 
> 
> See ya
>