limbo at actcom.co.il
Mon Jan 1 11:05:24 PST 2007
> Having re-read the original "content rating" discussion, it's clear that
> the initial proposal was for a uF for ratings of a current page, for
> which tagging was, not unreasonably, suggested.
> The current proposal is for a method of "rating" (in a very loose sense)
> the page which is being linked to, and for which tagging is not
I haven't followed the entire thread but this seems like a good use case for
xfolk or even hReview.
The xfolk version could look like this:
<a class="taggedlinked" href="http://goatse.cx">check this out!</a>
(<a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSFW">NSFW</a>)
The hReview version would probably be similar, maybe just a wrapper around
the xfolkentry to show that this is just one person's opinion and should be
taken as such.
More information about the microformats-discuss