Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously
non-referenced in the spec"References"]
Christopher St John
ckstjohn at gmail.com
Wed Jan 3 19:11:23 PST 2007
On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik <tantek at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, "Joe Andrieu" <joe at andrieu.net> wrote:
> > For the record, I do object.
> Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in email or
> IRC) who has objected to banning Andy.
I'm a little late, but for the record, I'd object to banning Andy as well.
I've been on lists where disruptive people had to be banned, but in
this case Andy is both well-intentioned and often (*cough* choking
this one out, hard to form the words) has good points.
And let's face it, compared to historical norms on, say, Usenet, Andy
doesn't even rank.
A small group of like-minded individuals with a common background
who know each other personally is easy to organize. This was that,
but it ain't no more. All for the good if it's recognized and adapted to,
unfortunate otherwise. Enough of that, though.
Christopher St. John
More information about the microformats-discuss