andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Mon Jan 8 11:58:13 PST 2007
<6ca82b0f0701042021l680f338eq5ddd1acd9db4a914 at mail.gmail.com>, Ben
Buchanan <microformats at 200ok.com.au> writes
>I don't see a clear reason why ?tag=blah couldn't be an acceptable
On reflection, it seems to me that that's an "unpaved cowpath".
Unfortunately, Google search for "?tag=" finds many instances of "tag".
I wonder if another search engine might be more specific, or if someone
has a way to trawl for it in some Google-code  like way?
More information about the microformats-discuss