[uf-discuss] Hidden elements considered harmful (Was: Inline
styleconflict?)
Mike Schinkel
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Sat Jan 13 06:47:44 PST 2007
Scott Reynen wrote:
> In general: hiding elements only hides them from humans, and
> leaves the content more accessible for machines than humans.
> Microformats are for humans first. For publishers: hidden
> elements are less likely to be kept up-to-date.
Counterpoint: For data generated from a database where the data is visible
elsewhere, this becomes a specious argument.
Scott Reynen wrote:
> For parsers:
> hidden elements are more likely to contain spam.
John Allsopp wrote:
> I think the fate of the meta element (unused by any search
> engine) pretty much demonstrates the difficult with invisible
> meta data
Counterpoint: These are specious arguments in the context of metadata that
is more tightly constrained and of the type that would provide spammers
little or no benefit. For example, I am not aware of spammers using <LINK>
elements yet <LINK> elements are invisible metadata that are used
appropriately on the web today.
It really makes more sense to look at the use-case rather than to issue a
blanket edit of prohibition. FWIW.
--
-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
"It never ceases to amaze how many people will proactively debate away
attempts to improve the web..."
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list