Vote on this: rel="me self" to indicate an authoritative
hCard {was: Re: [uf-discuss] Authoritative hCards [was
RE: Canonical hCards (was: Search on CSS element)]}
Ryan Cannon
ryan at ryancannon.com
Wed Jan 31 10:33:48 PST 2007
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
>> According to the spec, rel="self me" is invalid *unless*
>> you do not include the XFN profile on your Web site.
>
> Sorry, I've got muddled here. According to which spec? Are you
> referring to the “Exclusive of all other XFN values” part of the
> @rel=me spec [1]? That's also maintained, as @rel=self is not part of
> XFN, but (propositionally) of hcard.
Correct me if I'm wrong, I very well might be.
@rel=me is defined in the XFN profile it means (emphasis mine):
> A link to yourself at a *different* URL
@rel=self is defined (as far as I can tell) in the ATOM spec.[2] It
means:
> The value "self" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href
> attribute identifies a resource equivalent to the containing
> element.
The only way @rel="self me" would be valid is if the following
conditions
occurred:
* Two hCards appeared at different URLs
* The hCards linked to each other with @rel="me"
* The two hCards contained the same information
So according to current definitions of these terms, @rel="self me" could
not point to an authoritative hCard that contained better, more
robust or
more up-to-date information about the person.
However, perhaps @rel="via" might apply here, meaning semantically:
> that the IRI in the value of the href
> attribute identifies a resource that is the source of the
> information provided in the containing element.
In this way, the hCard with @rel=via could point to a different hCard
that
contains authoritative information.
[1]: http://www.gmpg.org/xfn/11#me
[2]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt
--
Ryan Cannon
Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list