[uf-discuss] a question about concatenation and hAtom entry content

[David Janes]

On 6/1/07, Ryan King <ryan at technorati.com> wrote:
> On May 31, 2007, at 11:29 AM, David Janes wrote:
>
> > On 5/31/07, Ryan King <ryan at technorati.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Another option is that entry content is:
> >>
> >> <p class="entry-content">Content</p>
> >> <p class="entry-content">More Content</p>
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there a reason why hAtom as currently spec'ed only does text, not
> >> markup?
> >
> > I thought it did markup! I totally see what you are saying here
> > though; the question here is whether we include the DOM nodes that
> > specify entry-content. This isn't in the spec, and you wouldn't want
> > to do it everywhere (entry-title, for example) but it would make sense
> > if it did.
>
> You're right, I'm suggesting that only for entry-content (and maybe
> entry-summary) that we take the nodes that have the class name on
> them. The reason? I've seen this several times:
>
> <... class="hentry">
>   ...
>   <p class="entry-content">...</p>
>
>   <p class="entry-content">...</p>
>
> </>
>
> It makes sense, to me, to put the paragraph nodes, intact, in the
> content.

I concur. Time to start ramping up for hAtom 0.2, if I can get some
blocks of free time.

Regards, etc...

-- 
David Janes
Founder, BlogMatrix
http://www.blogmatrix.com
http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com