[uf-discuss] atom:category scheme

Ryan King ryan at technorati.com
Fri Jun 1 11:27:24 PDT 2007

There has been some previous discussion[1] of this (in 2005!), but it  
seems to have been lost.

I think we should use rel-tag tagspaces for atom category schemes.

For those not familiar with Atom, category elements define 3  
attributes: term, label and scheme.

hAtom currently defines mapping to term and label (from the tag and  
text). I think we should map rel-tag tagspaces to atom:category schemes.

I've put an entry on [2] at [3].

Any reason why we shouldn't do this?


1. http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-issues#rel-tag
2. http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-issues
3. http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-issues#atom:category_scheme

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list