[uf-discuss] include-pattern parsing

Tantek Ç elik tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Wed Jun 20 22:37:51 PDT 2007

redirecting parsing assertion to microformats-dev per mailing-list

On 6/20/07 8:17 PM, "Michael MD" <mdagn at spraci.com> wrote:

>> Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern?
> given

no, not given, not without a URL to documentation.

> the complexity it adds to non-browser-based parsers

what specific complexities have you encountered in your development of a
non-browser-based parser and have you documented them on the wiki (say on
the include-pattern-issues page)?


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list