[uf-discuss] Geo Elevation Data
alexander.graf at deri.org
Mon Mar 19 06:18:22 PST 2007
Am 15.03.2007 um 20:52 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> In message <DCFF1356-345A-4CC8-A5DC-54FDE0759AC7 at deri.org>,
> Alexander Graf <alexander.graf at deri.org> writes
>>> <ol class="geo-route">
>>> <li class="geo">
>>> Latitude: <abbr class="latitude" title="-83.00000">-83.0000</abbr>
>>> Longitude: <abbr class="longitude" title="43.00000">43.0000</abbr>
>>> Elevation: <abbr class="elevation" title="2012.00000">2012.0000</
>> as geo is just used for encapsulating Lat/Lon values in hCards, I
>> don't think reusing is a good idea.
> I don't see how the above would break any existing (or future spec-
> abiding) "geo" or "hCard" implementations; the elevation data and
> geo-route class would simply be discarded.
Fair enough. Someone in this discssion said "geo" was locked as it's
a subset of hCard, which is locked too.
If geo is extendable that's even better!
- Elevation is the main feature that is missing
- Elevation could be positive and negative
- Timestamps for geo data should be optional but possible
- How about coordinate formats / map projection / dates?
More information about the microformats-discuss