[uf-discuss] Expanding the abbr pattern
microformats at 200ok.com.au
Wed May 2 18:45:59 PDT 2007
> So, I started this response thinking "How does a full-string timestamp /not/ disambiguate a March 2 date in the following?"
My answer is: by not being human-readable :) The example in the
original post shows the problem:
<abbr class="dtstart" title="20070312T1700-06">
March 12, 2007 at 5 PM, Central Standard Time
When vocalised, that title is less useful than the text it potentially
replaces (screen readers may read just the text, just the title or
Perhaps I should have said "effective disambiguation, for all human users".
At any rate, I think the main problem was referring to different
examples - in yours, the shorter date probably would make sense to all
users and yes it disambiguates. The datestamp in the microformat
however, does not disambiguate for humans.
...and I think I've used up my quota for "disambiguate", so I'll end there ;)
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson
More information about the microformats-discuss