[uf-discuss] human readable date parsing

Jon Gibbins (dotjay) dotjay at november5th.net
Thu May 3 13:14:32 PDT 2007

Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> and is not apparent to human readers
> To be clear, this clause, in the absolute, is undesirable.  That is, in
> following the principles of microformats, the date needs to be at least
> somewhat *visible* to humans, rather than invisible.

I still don't understand this part. Why would the ISO date need to be 
visible to users/humans? Does 'visible to humans' *really* equate to 
'will definitely be available to parsers'?



More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list