[uf-discuss] what is a microformat?
chris.messina at gmail.com
Sun May 6 23:25:35 PDT 2007
On 5/6/07, Scott Reynen <scott at randomchaos.com> wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Keith Alexander wrote:
> >> Indeed, there are already microformats, such as "nofollow", which we
> >> recognise as such, but which do not appear to have followed that
> >> process.
> > Given that, I'd perhaps redefine a 'Microformat' as an HTML
> > convention (can something like 'nofollow' be called a 'data
> > format'?) endorsed by the Microformats community.
> (I've never much liked rel-nofollow, so I'm largely biased when I say
> this:) I think it would be a mistake to redefine microformats such
> that rel-nofollow doesn't stand out. The open issues in rel-nofollow
>  strongly suggest it's not really a microformat at all. The
> issues are, basically: 1) the semantics are wrong, 2) the name is
> wrong, 3) it doesn't solve a real problem, and 4) it creates new
> problems. I'd say that makes it almost the antithesis of a microformat.
>  http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow#open_issues
I'd agree. rel-nofollow was a misguided abuse of HTML. Such is the
power of large search engines creating HTML conventions for the
benefit of their bottom lines.
I think if you go back to the name... we're not talking about
"micropatterns" (though I've used that for designer-friendly HTML
patterns) but "microformats" -- specifically an alternative to data
formats like RSS, ATOM, vcard and ical. You can certainly have
semantic conventions but semantic conventions alone do not a
Citizen Provocateur &
Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Cell: 412 225-1051
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
More information about the microformats-discuss