Re: [uf-discuss] ‘XHTML’ references to ‘HTML’

Ciaran McNulty mail at
Mon Nov 26 07:55:04 PST 2007

On Nov 26, 2007 3:42 PM, Ben Ward <lists at> wrote:
> This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology,
> not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility
> with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.

It sounds like a solid idea to me, but I'd really worry that it would
be unclear that we mean 'HTML and XHTML'.  Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to
be the global replacement?

-Ciaran McNulty

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list