Re: [uf-discuss] ‘XHTML’ references to ‘HTML’
mail at ciaranmcnulty.com
Mon Nov 26 07:55:04 PST 2007
On Nov 26, 2007 3:42 PM, Ben Ward <lists at ben-ward.co.uk> wrote:
> This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology,
> not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility
> with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.
It sounds like a solid idea to me, but I'd really worry that it would
be unclear that we mean 'HTML and XHTML'. Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to
be the global replacement?
More information about the microformats-discuss