Re: [uf-discuss] ‘XHTML’ references to ‘HTML’
andreluis.pt at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 08:10:15 PST 2007
I agree with the concern. I sat on a presentation where the speaker
spoke of microformats as if they were xhtml-only. I know the POSH
concept is there to prevent this confusion, but apparently, it's not
enough, Is it? Maybe POS(X)H doesn't seem to cut it, does it?
On Nov 26, 2007 3:55 PM, Ciaran McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 3:42 PM, Ben Ward <lists at ben-ward.co.uk> wrote:
> > This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology,
> > not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility
> > with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.
> It sounds like a solid idea to me, but I'd really worry that it would
> be unclear that we mean 'HTML and XHTML'. Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to
> be the global replacement?
> -Ciaran McNulty
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss