Re: [uf-discuss] ‘XHTML’ references to ‘HTML’

[André Luís]

+1.

I agree with the concern. I sat on a presentation where the speaker
spoke of microformats as if they were xhtml-only. I know the POSH
concept is there to prevent this confusion, but apparently, it's not
enough, Is it? Maybe POS(X)H doesn't seem to cut it, does it?

--
André Luís

On Nov 26, 2007 3:55 PM, Ciaran McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 3:42 PM, Ben Ward <lists at ben-ward.co.uk> wrote:
> > This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology,
> > not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility
> > with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.
>
> It sounds like a solid idea to me, but I'd really worry that it would
> be unclear that we mean 'HTML and XHTML'.  Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to
> be the global replacement?
>
> -Ciaran McNulty
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>