Re: [uf-discuss] Re: ‘XHTML’ references to ‘HTML’

[André Luís]

Here's an idea... since that would involve altering every page with
xhtml in them anyway, why not go one step further and in the first
reference to XHTML change it to "HTML or XHTML" with a link to an
explanatory page? Stating that ufs work on both worlds.

--
André

On Nov 26, 2007 9:10 PM, Ben Ward <lists at ben-ward.co.uk> wrote:
> By mentioning 'XHTML and HTML' in each first instance, we make clear
> that both flavours are compatible, whilst using 'HTML' there on reads
> as a cleaner abbreviation.
>
> Ben