[uf-discuss] Re: Standardized Representation of Microformats
in JSON / was: (no subject) & hCardMapper v0.96
danbri at danbri.org
Thu Apr 3 02:43:16 PST 2008
Toby A Inkster wrote:
> plus vCard 'X-GENDER' as 'xGender' in jCard.
Does it make sense to carry through that 'x'?
Purpose: To specify the gender of the object the vCard represents.
Value type: A single text value.
Special notes: The value "M" stands for male while "F" stands for
FWIW doesn't seem to rule *out* additional values, which makes it
consistent with the FOAF design (although we use 'male' and 'female' as
the two most well-known values for foaf:gender). While out of scope for
this thread, I'm very interested to have collaboration between FOAF and
Microformat approaches on representing gender; both in the vocabulary
sense, but also in making nice accessible form controls that allow
type-in values as well as a constrained list.
Nearby in the Web: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav "This
list is for discussion of revisions to vCard (RFC 2426) and the cardDAV
More information about the microformats-discuss