[uf-discuss] Re: Possible alternative methods for "include"

Andy Mabbett andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Sun Feb 3 11:46:30 PST 2008

In message <2ang75-8r4.ln1 at ophelia.g5n.co.uk>, Toby A Inkster
<mail at tobyinkster.co.uk> writes

>The order of the space-delimited class attributes should be considered
>significant -- that is, in <foo class="bar #baz"> the content referred
>to by #baz is logically included as the last child of the <foo>
>element, but in <foo class="#baz bar">, it is logically included as the
>first child.

I don't understand why that's necessary. Can you elaborate, please?

Meanwhile, my proposal is now on the wiki:


Andy Mabbett

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list