[uf-discuss] haudio contributor

[Guillaume Lebleu]

Andy Mabbett wrote:
> In message <47AA4D28.9040009 at lebleu.org>, Guillaume Lebleu 
> <guillaume at lebleu.org> writes
>
>>> not least because the alternative:
>>>
>>>         <foo class="fn">Pink Floyd</foo>
>>>
>>> would be "optimised" (sic) to have a given name of "Pink" and a family
>>> name of "Floyd".
>>>
>>>
>> I don't disagree that groups/bands should be considered organisations.
>>
>> That said, I don't think the reason offered here is a strong one.
>
> Neither do I; that's why I said "not least".
>
Sorry if I misinterpreted: I'm not a native english speaker.
Doesn't "not least because [reason]" means that [reason] is not the 
least reason, i.e. a strong one?

Guillaume