[uf-discuss] haudio contributor
guillaume at lebleu.org
Thu Feb 7 07:46:27 PST 2008
Andy Mabbett wrote:
> In message <47AA4D28.9040009 at lebleu.org>, Guillaume Lebleu
> <guillaume at lebleu.org> writes
>>> not least because the alternative:
>>> <foo class="fn">Pink Floyd</foo>
>>> would be "optimised" (sic) to have a given name of "Pink" and a family
>>> name of "Floyd".
>> I don't disagree that groups/bands should be considered organisations.
>> That said, I don't think the reason offered here is a strong one.
> Neither do I; that's why I said "not least".
Sorry if I misinterpreted: I'm not a native english speaker.
Doesn't "not least because [reason]" means that [reason] is not the
least reason, i.e. a strong one?
More information about the microformats-discuss