[uf-discuss] XOXO Implementations

[Toby A Inkster]

Many -- in fact, most! -- of the links to "simple examples" and 
"implementations" on the XOXO specification do not conform to XOXO.

e.g.
	http://diveintomark.org/public/2004/01/xo-embeddable.xo
	http://odeo.com/profile/RyanKing/xoxo
	http://homepage.mac.com/ctholland/thelab/outlines/

They do not include class="xoxo" on the root list element. The 
specification says:

	The root element of a simple well-formed XML XOXO page is 
	either an ol or ul with class name of "xoxo".

If this class name is not really a requirement of XOXO, then the 
specification is misleading and should be changed. If the class name *is* 
a requirement, then can these examples be removed and replaced with 
conforming examples?

-- 
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
[Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux]
[OS: Linux 2.6.17.14-mm-desktop-9mdvsmp, up 21 days, 15:35.]

                               Bottled Water
          http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/02/18/bottled-water/