[uf-discuss] Possible alternative methods for "include"

[Andy Mabbett]

A brainstorm of possible alternative methods of using include in
microformats, avoiding the use of the problematic "OBJECT" or empty-link
variants:


        <foo id="birminghamid" class="locality">Birmingham</foo>

then:

        <foo class="adr birminghamid">[...]</foo>

or

        <foo class="adr part-microformat birminghamid">[...]</foo>

or

        <foo class="adr use-birminghamid">[...]</foo>

or

        <foo class="adr locality-birminghamid">[...]</foo>

or

        <foo id="birminghamid">Birmingham</foo>

        [...]

        <foo class="adr locality-birminghamid">[...]</foo>


Note: "birminghamid" used for clarity; "birmingham" would be the
semantically correct value.

-- 
Andy Mabbett