[uf-discuss] rel-license: what does the license apply to? (open
kevinmarks at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 17:52:22 PST 2008
Is the problem that the page contains multiple video elements? If so
using hAtom to define them as separate entries may help clarify this,
especially in conjunction with rel-enclosure.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
<supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Angus,
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Angus McIntyre <angus at pobox.com> wrote:
> > I'm in the process of adding 'rel="license"' in the relevant places on
> > blip.tv, a video-sharing site, and I've run squarely into the 'open issue'
> > raised by Evan on 2006-04-07 (in the wiki). Namely, there's no obvious way
> > to specify that the license applies to a content element on a page - a
> > picture, a video - rather than the page as a whole.
> (I should probably check this before posting... but I'm in a rush...)
> >From what I remember of the HTML spec, an <a> element with the "rel"
> attribute set applies to all or part of the HTML page.
> An example of this is rel-bookmark used for hAtom.
> So... the rel-license could apply just to the video.
> >From a machine point-of-view, there's no way (that I'm aware of) to
> differentiate when the rel-license applies to the whole page or part
> of the page.
> Suggestions welcome.
> See ya
> Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
> Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss