[uf-discuss] Google Rich Snippets - testing tool

[Chris Ruppel]

First, another echo for the great work that went into this tool!

I noticed another issue with the results of Kevin's test: the
dtreviewed value isn't getting parsed into a human-readable date in
the sample result.

Here's a sample with a human-friendly date for comparison (it may be
due to the dashes in my dtreviewed value)
http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhichtwitterapp.com%2Freviews%2Fadobe-air%2Ftweetdeck-desktop

Chris

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Kevin Marks<kevinmarks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Great tool guys.
>
> I tried it on my original hReviews, - looks like your rating
> extraction is not honouring the abbr title pattern - it shows you
> seeing my unicode stars, not the title='4'
>
>
> http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=http%3A%2F%2Fepeus.blogspot.com%2F2005%2F04%2Frevisiting-waugh-and-armstrong.html
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Edward O'Connor<hober0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> We have created an early version of a testing tool to allow webmasters
>>> to check that their markup is being correctly parsed by Google for use
>>> in Rich Snippets.
>>
>> Wow, very nice. Thanks for making this available!
>>
>>> We would love to have you try the tool out and send us suggestions,
>>> points of confusion, bugs, or any other general feedback.
>>
>> Does the tool support hCard's additional-name? I don't see any of the
>> middle names from <http://federali.st/declaration> in the results. I'm
>> also surprised by some results for <http://federali.st/constitution>.
>>
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Edward O'Connor
>> _______________________________________________
>> microformats-discuss mailing list
>> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
>> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>