updating hAtom (was Re: [uf-discuss] Progress on hAtom?) and a
quick note on hNews
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Fri Jul 17 14:13:35 PDT 2009
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Tantek Çelik <tantek at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Simon<dude42 at gmx.de> wrote:
> > I just wondered if there is any progress on hAtom.
> > There are many open questions on the issues page, but nothing really happend
> > since version 0.1.
> Hi Simon, apologies for the delay - been a bit busy with organizing
> First all, thanks very much for adding to the notes on hAtom issues
> and proposed resolutions:
> This is precisely one of the first things we need to do to update hAtom:
> * proposed resolutions to all outstanding issues with at least some
> amount of consensus.
> Next we will need to take a look at any hAtom brainstorming that has
> occurred since hAtom 0.1 and consider each brainstorm to see if it
> makes sense to include in hAtom 0.2 or not.
> Finally, we'll need an editor (hopefully David Janes, but he's agreed
> to let me co-edit in the event he is too busy to do so) to incorporate
> these changes in 0.2.
I'm in to help. I've been hesitating because the uF process sometimes
gives me indigestion, but I think it's time we hit this one.
More information about the microformats-discuss