[uf-discuss] re: HTML5 support
Martin McEvoy
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Tue Jul 13 18:45:59 PDT 2010
Hello Oli ...
On 13/07/2010 17:59, Oli Studholme wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Martin McEvoy<martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote
>> I wouldnt really be surprised to see microdata disappear all together(but
>> that's just my thought)
> But how could microdata possibly disappear now that Google supports it? ;)
Because Microdata is far to obtrusive to be practical in the "real
world" for example....
Microdata vcard example from
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#vcard
<span itemscope itemtype="http://microformats.org/profile/hcard">
<span itemprop=fn>
<span itemprop="n">
<span itemprop="given-name">George</span>
<span itemprop="family-name">Washington</span>
</span>
</span>
</span>
8 lines of code which would parse as:
BEGIN:VCARD
PROFILE:VCARD
VERSION:3.0
SOURCE:document's address
FN:George Washington
N:Washington;George;;;
END:VCARD
great you would think, now try that using microformats, example from
http://yiid.cc/3GI2
<span class="vcard">
<span class="fn">George Washington</span>
</span>
3 lines of code which parses as:
BEGIN:VCARD
SOURCE:document's address
NAME:document's title
VERSION:3.0
N;CHARSET=UTF-8:Washington;George;;;
FN;CHARSET=UTF-8:George Washington
END:VCARD
from a commercial and practical point of view, microdata is definitely
not intended to be for "humans first" .
Anyway believe what you like, microdata needs a *lot* of work before it
can ever be considered as "micro" as far as I can see, at the moment It
just confuses people into using an unnecessary semantic.
Best wishes
--
Martin McEvoy
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list