[uf-discuss] HTML 4 strict only
ajaswa at gmail.com
Mon Mar 22 14:12:13 PST 2010
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Toby Inkster <mail at tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote:
> The rel- and rev-based microformats (e.g. rel-tag, votelinks, etc) can
> be used validly as far back as HTML 2.0. But HTML 2.0 didn't include a
> class attribute, so the bigger microformats can't be used.
> I think the HTML 3.0 drafts included the class attribute, but HTML 3.0
> faltered and never really happened. HTML 3.2 was published as a W3C
> Recommendation, but didn't include class. (The DTD explicitly mentions
> it as something that was omitted.)
Ha. I would hop no-one uses HTML 2.0 any more! Thanks for pointing that out.
More information about the microformats-discuss