I agree with Sam... Kind of like DRM, not much point - spammers just write better tools.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/21/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Sam Deane</b> <<a href="mailto:lists@elegantchaos.com">
lists@elegantchaos.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 20 Jul 2005, at 00:06, Robert Bachmann wrote:
<br><br>> Instead of writing<br>><br>> <a class="email"<br>> href="mailto:<a href="mailto:rbach@rbach.priv.at">rbach@rbach.priv.at</a>"><a href="mailto:rbach@rbach.priv.at">rbach@rbach.priv.at
</a></a><br>><br>> one could write:<br>><br>> <a class="e&#109;ail"<br>> href="&#109;ailto:rbach&#064;rbach.priv.at">rbach&#064;rbach.priv.at</<br>> a>
<br><br>I think you're fighting a losing battle there. To be of value the<br>information has to be machine readable, and if it's machine readable<br>then the spammers will eventually write a spider to harvest it.<br>_______________________________________________
<br>microformats-discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:microformats-discuss@microformats.org">microformats-discuss@microformats.org</a><br><a href="http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss">http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>