[uf-new] Proposal to split media-info exploration

[Alexandre Van de Sande]

I think that would be a great idea manu I support it.
Please give us the link so we can contribute also

On 4/9/07, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> The media-info discussion was started on December 17th, 2005. It has
> been almost sixteen months and every time media-info is mentioned, it
> seems that it will be at least another six months before the first draft
> is completed. Contributors seem to be shying away from it because it
> seems like such a daunting task (the reason being: it is). So in the
> spirit of the Microformat process, let us simplify the problem.
>
> I propose that we split the media-info exploratory discussion into three
> parts: audio, video and images.
>
> The exploratory examples for audio have been completed. From what I have
> heard, nobody has said that there shouldn't be a media-info uF for
> audio. In addition to that, music (audio) seems to be the one of most
> interest at the moment. I am volunteering to create an
> audio-info-examples page, collate all of the analysis results that are
> in media-info into the new page and write a draft specification for
> audio-info.
>
> If there are no objections, I'd like to start this process soon. The
> goal would be to have a draft audio-info spec in about a month or two,
> and then move onto video and images. Once all three uF drafts are
> completed, the requirements for media-info will be automatically fulfilled.
>
> -- manu
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
>