[uf-new] hAudio - audio-album and audio-podcast

[Martin McEvoy]

On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 00:03 +0000, Brian Suda wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
> > Colin you have a good point here
> > haudio would not be extended far enough to suit the classical
> > communities needs when you take into account that Beethoven has nine
> > symphonies with a total of 37 movements with sub properties of
> ...
> 
> On 6/5/07, Colin Barrett <timber at lava.net> wrote:
> > Another example: You don't mark up information about the song "Star
> > Spangled Banner," you mark up the information about Jimi Hendrix's
> > particular recording of it. e.g, year would be 1967, not 1814.
> 
> --- now we are spiraling back to ideas of what people "WANT" rather
> than model what is being published. Another concern i have been having
> about this prososal is that it is more about exposing existing company
> Database Schemas, rather than what the average person is publishing.
> The more i think about it, the more i realise i have never seen a blog
> talk about the run-time of track 3 of a given CD. It is always, "that
> CD is great, you should buy it". Which is more of a review than any
> sort of media-format. We are spending alot of time trying to model a
> database schema of existing companies rather than see what people are
> publish.

we are not talking about blogs though are we? we are talking about music
download sites which do have run times and track numbers?

> 
> We need to avoid, "what about ..." suggestions, otherwise we will have
> more endless cyclical conversations.

which is, I guess, why the media info discussion ground to a halt?


-Martin-
> 
> -brian
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2171 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/attachments/20070606/9ae2e70b/smime.bin