[uf-new] hAudio - audio-album and audio-podcast
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Tue Jun 5 17:23:13 PDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 00:03 +0000, Brian Suda wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
> > Colin you have a good point here
> > haudio would not be extended far enough to suit the classical
> > communities needs when you take into account that Beethoven has nine
> > symphonies with a total of 37 movements with sub properties of
> On 6/5/07, Colin Barrett <timber at lava.net> wrote:
> > Another example: You don't mark up information about the song "Star
> > Spangled Banner," you mark up the information about Jimi Hendrix's
> > particular recording of it. e.g, year would be 1967, not 1814.
> --- now we are spiraling back to ideas of what people "WANT" rather
> than model what is being published. Another concern i have been having
> about this prososal is that it is more about exposing existing company
> Database Schemas, rather than what the average person is publishing.
> The more i think about it, the more i realise i have never seen a blog
> talk about the run-time of track 3 of a given CD. It is always, "that
> CD is great, you should buy it". Which is more of a review than any
> sort of media-format. We are spending alot of time trying to model a
> database schema of existing companies rather than see what people are
we are not talking about blogs though are we? we are talking about music
download sites which do have run times and track numbers?
> We need to avoid, "what about ..." suggestions, otherwise we will have
> more endless cyclical conversations.
which is, I guess, why the media info discussion ground to a halt?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2171 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/attachments/20070606/9ae2e70b/smime.bin
More information about the microformats-new