[uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Sat Jun 9 01:03:30 PDT 2007
In message <000a01c7aa5c$c85cda30$0201a8c0 at andrieuhome>, Joe Andrieu
<joe at andrieu.net> writes
>Either we need a generic "exclusion" container so that parent uFs can
>know to ignore potential duplicates in a child uF--which I think is the
>heart of the "mfo" suggestion--
How would they be backwards-compatible?
>or we need unique field names.
Unique field names are "POSH".
Otherwise, we might as well start labelling with class="thing" or
class="property16", class="property17" et al.
More information about the microformats-new