[uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

[Andy Mabbett]

In message <000a01c7aa5c$c85cda30$0201a8c0 at andrieuhome>, Joe Andrieu 
<joe at andrieu.net> writes

>Either we need a generic "exclusion" container so that parent uFs can 
>know to ignore potential duplicates in a child uF--which I think is the 
>heart of the "mfo" suggestion--

How would they be backwards-compatible?

>or we need unique field names.

Unique field names are "POSH".

Otherwise, we might as well start labelling with class="thing" or 
class="property16", class="property17" et al.

-- 
Andy Mabbett