[uf-new] hAudio final draft
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Fri Jun 15 15:21:42 PDT 2007
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 23:10 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 16:02 -0500, David Janes wrote:
> > On 6/15/07, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> > > The final submission of the hAudio draft is on the wiki:
> > >
> > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal
> > >
> > > Changes:
> > >
> > > * Adopted 'audio-title' to specify the title of the recording
> > > * Fixed a typo concerning contributor class
> > > * Fixed all references from 'fn' to 'audio-title'
> > > * Updated mailing list discussion page
> > > * Added "Specification Development Statistics" section
> > >
> > > We have successfully integrated haudio with several of our client sites
> > > which will be going live in the next 2-3 weeks. We are also currently
> > > authoring the haudio Operator plugin (which should be compatible with
> > > Firefox 3 when it launches). We are also going to be working on
> > > Wordpress plugins to aid hAudio in becoming adopted more rapidly in the
> > > blogging community.
> > >
> > > As of this point, all major concerns have been addressed. Please review
> > > and send feedback to the list - if there is no feedback that changes the
> > > draft significantly, this will be the last proposed version for this
> > > round of the hAudio discussion.
> > (1)
> > Sorry to bring up this sore point, but why "audio-title" over "fn"? I
> > did see your feedback a couple of days ago about the concepts of
> > "audio-title" being different from "track-title", etc (I can't
> > remember the exact terms, but you get the point). However, it seems to
> > me that "fn" could be used to represent each of these _concepts_, as
> > the "fn" will be appropriately nested within identifying containers.
> we never did get to the bottom of this it was just left hanging!
> > (2)
> > A little voice in my head says this is more general than audio...
> my little voice tells me baaad things but I guess its not a subject of
> this list...
...ok then it is
do you think that the title of an audio file is always the same as the
actual file itself?
or that audio-title refers to both a download-able file or an album
Im having difficulty again understanding how this is different than
either "fn" or "summary" or "whatever"
> > Regards, etc...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2171 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/attachments/20070615/c077be97/smime.bin
More information about the microformats-new