[uf-new] First draft of hAudio proposal

[Andy Mabbett]

In message <21e523c20705021222v20d7fb3pf4aef9c53a2b1046 at mail.gmail.com>,
David Janes <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> writes

>On 5/2/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>> In message
>> <21e523c20705020405o1f08c1d3s29a8c8bef104a830 at mail.gmail.com>, David
>> Janes <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> writes

>> >If you mean what most people do by "title", then FN is the correct
>> >thing to use.
>>
>>
>> How does that square with the principle of making things easier for
>> publishers? "title" (or "movie-title" or "job-title", or whatever) is
>> surely easier for publisher to remember, and more obvious when updating
>> code,  than the awful "FN"!
>>
>> How is "FN" supported, in preference to "title " or "*-title" by the
>> evidence gathered?
>
>Did you even read what I wrote Andy?

Yes; you asserted that, in a certain circumstance, ' "FN" is the correct
thing to use'. I then asked you justify that; in relation to making
things easy for publishers, and in relation to the evidence gathered so
far.

You appear to have done neither.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
            *  Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
            *  Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
            *  Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?