[uf-new] First draft of hAudio proposal
Scott Reynen
scott at makedatamakesense.com
Wed May 2 18:40:55 PDT 2007
On May 2, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Scott, why don't we allow verbs for rel-design-patterns?
Unless otherwise noted, I'm only speaking for myself on this list.
This is why I don't like verbs in rel:
The rel attribute is short for relationship, not action. Verbs
describe actions. Nouns describe relationships. Most rel-
microformats follow this convention. The one that doesn't has this
as the first open issue:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow#open_issues
"nofollow indicates a behavior rather than a relationship"
I'll retract my suggestion to change from a verb to a noun and
instead suggest changing from rel to class. I think what we're
describing is a class of link, specifically the class that allows us
to acquire, not a relationship between two documents.
--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list