[uf-new] hAudio: audio-title/album-title vs. recording/album
msporny at digitalbazaar.com
Fri Oct 12 13:01:35 PDT 2007
Brian Suda wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>> So we leave album-title and audio-title as it is?
>>> Or are we going to talk about it?
>> I was giving others at least a week to weigh in on the issue if they
>> wanted to... didn't want to front-load the discussion. :)
> --- i was under the impression this was still an open issue that is
> already solved with FN. I was unaware this was still a discussion
FN doesn't solve the problem because the examples demonstrate that the
type of the hAudio, whether the item is an audio track or audio album,
is never explicitly stated, but is instead implied by the markup.
Therefore, we need at least two properties that imply both type and title.
If we were to use FN, it would be impossible to distinguish between an
album (an concept that can contain more than one hAudio) and a
song/speech (an individual hAudio).
Got any suggestions as to how we imply that an hAudio is either a single
work (song/speech/sound effect), or a collection of works (album)?
More information about the microformats-new