[uf-new] hAudio proposal: ITEM/TRACK

Michael Smethurst Michael.Smethurst at bbc.co.uk
Mon Oct 15 06:28:19 PDT 2007

Not wanting to add to the confusion but would it not be possible to have
infinitely nested haudios with neither item or track and use mfo when the
markup enforces containment that you don't want to be reflected in the

On 15/10/07 14:11, "Scott Reynen" <scott at makedatamakesense.com> wrote:

> On Oct 14, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> Scott, Andy - do each of you have further thoughts on approach #1
>> (assuming we can change the definition for ITEM)? Would it be
>> acceptable
>> to either of you?
> I don't have strong feelings either way on item vs. track.
> --
> Scott Reynen
> MakeDataMakeSense.com
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

More information about the microformats-new mailing list