[uf-new] hAudio ITEM debate proposal #3

[Manu Sporny]

Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> 
>> Scott, I think you and I had the most adverse reactions to this
>> approach. I've learned to live with it as this approach did not cause
>> problems when marking up over 20 of the audio-info examples.
>>
>> Thoughts, suggestions, comments?
> 
> 
> As long as an ITEM within an HAUDIO is itself defined as an audio
> recording, I see no problem with leaving out the HAUDIO class name here.

Yes, that is the approach that this proposal takes.

-- manu