[uf-new] The Process (was: hAudio case study)
Mary Hodder
mary at dabble.com
Wed Sep 12 09:52:02 PDT 2007
I'd second that.
Even if users are just plopping blobs of data that is recognizable to
humans when presented in a blog, but unstructured, we can still make
sense
of those blobs and structure them.
Seeing what people want to do makes more sense that imposing from on
high. That is typical of standard's bodies and in practice not often
followed.
For an example of this, where some standards from on high, are
compared to some standards that emerged, in video metadata, see this:
http://microformats.org/wiki/media-metadata-examples#Comparison_Table
mary
Mary Hodder
Founder: Dabble
Blogs: Dabble.com/blog
Napsterization.org/stories
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
>
>> Would it not be better for ufs to standardise markup based on the
>> domain
>> model than waste time wading through flakey html? [Perhaps]
>
> I don't believe looking at current publishing practices is a waste
> of time at all. Much the opposite, I think it's the most important
> part of the process. Domain models that don't account for what is
> published on the real web tend to be less useful on the real web.
>
> --
> Scott Reynen
> MakeDataMakeSense.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list