[uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant

Manu Sporny msporny at digitalbazaar.com
Thu Sep 13 07:46:39 PDT 2007

Martin McEvoy wrote:
> I am not trying to be too simplistic here but I hope you can see what I
> am trying to say, 

I don't think I see everything that you're trying to say, Martin... but
I'll try to summarize what I think you are saying:

I think you're making an argument for not bloating hAudio by adding too
many new class names.

I think you think that I'm making an argument for adding album, toplist,
podcast, playlist, and others. I am definitely not making this argument,
although reading back through the thread, I can see how it might be
construed that I am proposing adding a 5-7 new class names to hAudio.

This thread started by trying to eliminate the hAlbum proposal. I think
we should still do that, the question is... how do we eliminate hAlbum,
but keep the functionality of hAlbum?

> If we bloat haudio in the ways you and others are suggesting then the
> actual use of hAudio (in my opinion) will be very slow indeed.

I don't think any of us want to bloat hAudio. Right now, I am proposing
adding two things to hAudio in order to eliminate hAlbum:


-- manu

More information about the microformats-new mailing list