[uf-new] rel=license scoping and hAudio

[Toby A Inkster]

> "Now that RFC 4946 [2] specifies rel-license for Atom, should we adopt
> that as a normative reference?"
> Its a Good thought it would almost eliminate the rel="licence"  
> issue for
> good.

I don't think this would necessarily help. RFC 4946 allows links to  
multiple licences, but the implication is not that the different  
licences apply to different parts of the article, but rather that the  
licences are each alternative licences for the entire article - which  
is pretty much the same situation that we already have.

It also doesn't solve the practical problem of misinterpretation by  
RDFa parsers.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>