[no sig]RE: [uf-new] Dublin Core (was: hAudio FN or Title)

[Ottevanger, Jeremy]

Thank you David, that's very interesting. It would fill a pretty
important gap in describing basic phenomena - time, place, and agents
have their uF but not things, in the general sense. Even the simplest
container, DC questions aside, would be a very useful step.

Cheers, Jeremy

-----Original Message-----
From: microformats-new-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-new-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of David
Janes
Sent: 04 February 2008 17:30
To: For discussion of new microformats.
Subject: Re: RE: [uf-new] Dublin Core (was: hAudio FN or Title)

There's been information collected about how an "item" microformat would
work, though by no means consider this official, blessed, voted upon, or
even official proposed. If anyone is really serious about going down
this road, I suggest going back though the mailing list archives,
especially around the time hAudio was getting to 0.1.

For the record, my idea (now) of hItem would work is:
- as the _intersection_ of item attributes, roughly ;-)
- as a building block for use in other uFs, following the process

I'm still lurking at hAudio discussions to see how this is all working
out.