[uf-new] PROPOSAL: Replace hAudio FN with TITLE

[Sarven Capadisli]

Some of this was already mentioned but here are my thoughts for
whatever it's worth:

I think that FN is more likely to cause a conflict then TITLE for
audio title simply because FN is more likely ('must' have in hCard) to
occur in hCard then TITLE if and where hAudio uses FN instead of
TITLE. Based on this I would simply favour using TITLE over FN in
hAudio.

Perhaps I do not understand this bit fully but I wanted to mention the
'contributor' in hAudio where it may contain FN; wouldn't this further
complicate things if we use FN instead of TITLE for the audio title?

If TITLE is not the way to go -- for reasons because we don't agree or
have not explored enough -- then I think using something like
AUDIO-TITLE would be the next logical option.

(IMHO) At this point, this issue can be either resolved (as more
voices appear to be in favour of TITLE in hAudio *and* as we seem to
have explored 'this' branch) or it can be kept open for some (?) time
to give some of the community members to catchup or formulate their
own line of thoughts. How and where do we draw the line in order to
move on?

+1 for using TITLE in hAudio.

-Sarven