[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Martin McEvoy]

Martin McEvoy wrote:
> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > What's wrong with simply using hAtom as it is (possibly with the
>>>> > addition of Sarven's "in-reply-to" proposal)
> [...edit...]
>>>> Ok lets re-use hatom terms only this works...
>>>>
>>>> <div class="hentry">
>>>>   <address class="author vcard">
>>>>       <span class="entry-title"><a class="url fn" 
>>>> href="http://contributor.com/blog/">Contributor</a> said</span>
>>>>   </address>
>>>>   about <abbr class="updated" title="2008-09-01T14:40:45+01:00">72 
>>>> days ago</abbr>,
>>>>   <div class="entry-content">
>>>>      <p>Hey Great Post</p>
>>>>    </div>
>>>>   <a rel="bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
>>>> </div>
>>>>
>>>> Is this proposed mark up acceptable there is a test page here: 
>>>> http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html
>>>>
>>>> and the extracted Atom Is here: 
>>>> http://transformr.co.uk/hatom/http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html
>>>>
>
> I have updated the comment brainstorming pages, the Schema[1] strictly 
> re-uses hAtom[2] terms
>
> [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema
> [2] http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom
>
> Thanks
>
I would also like to propose that an hEntry that is a comment should be 
marked up like this.....

<div class="comment hentry">
...
</div>

 This will  define the  difference  between the Post  hEntry  and a 
comment hEntry


Thanks


-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/